Clips from Bush's White House Press Corps dinner, which was a riot, are here. Click on the image to see the video.
A Bush impersonator stands by and gives the "what Bush is really thinking" commentary as W speaks. Brilliant!
Mayday
So, tomorrow, May Day, is the big day of Hispanic Supremacy. The commies and islamists are joining in too. Supposedly the goal is for illegal foreigners in this country to not work and not buy anything, and to bring several major cities to a halt.
Yes, let's all support foreign blackmail of our society! Wheee! Everybody's doing it! The idea is we'll decide we have no sovereignty and our border policy can be set by foreigners. Hurray!
California Democrats are apparently in solidarity with the foreigners, and stand against the citizens who elected them. Apparently they have arranged for the Legislature to be closed tomorrow, so instead of doing the work they were hired to do, they are in fact taking orders from foreign agents. Interesting set of priorities. To make it worse, the California Senate has issued a resolution supporting students who walk out of school. Way to be for education!
With any luck though, that would have been the day they were to allbe indoctrinated with learn about the important contributions of homosexuals to American History.
Is that not seditious? Should those politicians not be tarred and feathered if not hanged?
On the other hand, this could be win-win.
I will be splurging to show the commies and our traitorous politicians who wields real economic power. If it indeed hurts us, it will wake a lot of people up. And as others have pointed out, a true reckoning would be for us to also see the savings we'd get by refusing public services to illegals for a day.
How 'bout that, amigo?
Or, who knows, if it's a fizzle, we might realize A Day Without Mexicans isn't the disaster it's made out to be, and decide we really don't need them.
Everytime the anti-Anglo-culture people pull something like this, I just send more $$$ to the Republicans.
I've got any number now of pins, cards, and placards suitable for framing now, for all my contributions.
They're even offering to inscribe my name on a wall at the Ronald Reagan museum!
The House Committee. The Elizabeth Dole Senatorial Committee. The Presidential Committee. The freakin' National Committee.
I've supported them all.
And here's the kicker.
I'm not even a Republican!
I never gave any money to ANYBODY until the 2004 election cycle.
Now I give them oodles of cash and demand they build a fence.
We need a fence!
Yes, let's all support foreign blackmail of our society! Wheee! Everybody's doing it! The idea is we'll decide we have no sovereignty and our border policy can be set by foreigners. Hurray!
California Democrats are apparently in solidarity with the foreigners, and stand against the citizens who elected them. Apparently they have arranged for the Legislature to be closed tomorrow, so instead of doing the work they were hired to do, they are in fact taking orders from foreign agents. Interesting set of priorities. To make it worse, the California Senate has issued a resolution supporting students who walk out of school. Way to be for education!
With any luck though, that would have been the day they were to all
The bill, which was passed by a Senate committee Tuesday, would require schools to buy textbooks ``accurately'' portraying ``the sexual diversity of our society.'' More controversially, it could require that students hear history lessons on ``the contributions of people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender to the economic, political, and social development of California and the United States of America.''I mean, imagine that! Government telling people to not work and walk out of school!!! To support the whims of foreigners???
Is that not seditious? Should those politicians not be tarred and feathered if not hanged?
On the other hand, this could be win-win.
I will be splurging to show the commies and our traitorous politicians who wields real economic power. If it indeed hurts us, it will wake a lot of people up. And as others have pointed out, a true reckoning would be for us to also see the savings we'd get by refusing public services to illegals for a day.
How 'bout that, amigo?
Or, who knows, if it's a fizzle, we might realize A Day Without Mexicans isn't the disaster it's made out to be, and decide we really don't need them.
Everytime the anti-Anglo-culture people pull something like this, I just send more $$$ to the Republicans.
I've got any number now of pins, cards, and placards suitable for framing now, for all my contributions.
They're even offering to inscribe my name on a wall at the Ronald Reagan museum!
The House Committee. The Elizabeth Dole Senatorial Committee. The Presidential Committee. The freakin' National Committee.
I've supported them all.
And here's the kicker.
I'm not even a Republican!
I never gave any money to ANYBODY until the 2004 election cycle.
Now I give them oodles of cash and demand they build a fence.
We need a fence!
New Strategery
I think this little news article could be revealing something with big implications:
Furthermore,
See here for example about the widening revelations concerning fired CIA leaker Mary McCarthy. Be sure to see all the updates at that link! If the Republicans are the "Culture of Corruption", the Democrats are the Culture of Treason...
I've seen many fools, even tv pundits who should know better, asking indignantly, why the "seeming double standard" about it being "ok" for the White House (via Scooter Libby, apparently) to "leak" information, but not for hard-working underlings "speaking Truth to Power" at the CIA or Pentagon or State Department? In other words, isn't the outrage over those latter leaks hypocritical and just outrage over political damage rather than over the moral substance?
To which the answer is a resounding NO, because when the President releases information (which makes it weird to call it a "leak"), it is by definition an authorized declassification, by Constitutional authority.
And by Excecutive Order, it's also authorized when the Vice President does it.
But, duh, when anyone else takes it upon themselves to expose classified information to the press, it's an unauthorized leak, they are commiting a crime, and should be punished.
Why is that so hard to understand? Here's a Congresswoman, for heaven's sake!
But I digress.
More good stuff:
Not only are they gutting the involvement of the hopelessly politicized CIA, they are also taking out the meddling of the State department to throw up roadblocks.
I am reminded how we had Mullah Omar in our sites shortly after 9/11, but had to waste time getting approval from a cabal of military lawyers about whether or not using a 2,000-lb bomb to take out the building he was in would be "legal" or not (a ridiculous concept in this context!), and while they dithered he got away.
And finally, in addition to the main broad "general campaign plan",
WASHINGTON (AFP) - The US military will take an expanded role in the US global "war on terror" under new plans which have reportedly been approved by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.Note well: "Outside" of the current warzones!
The plans call for a significantly expanded role for Special Operations troops in operations to combat terrorism outside of war zones such as Iraq and Afghanistan, the Washington Post report said quoting unnamed officials.
Furthermore,
The plan, developed over three years by the Special Operations Command (SOCOM) in Tampa, Florida, increases military involvement in areas traditionally handled by the Central Intelligence Agency and the State Department, the report said.That is significant. We have seen over these years how both State and the CIA have attempted to undercut the Administration at nearly every turn.
See here for example about the widening revelations concerning fired CIA leaker Mary McCarthy. Be sure to see all the updates at that link! If the Republicans are the "Culture of Corruption", the Democrats are the Culture of Treason...
I've seen many fools, even tv pundits who should know better, asking indignantly, why the "seeming double standard" about it being "ok" for the White House (via Scooter Libby, apparently) to "leak" information, but not for hard-working underlings "speaking Truth to Power" at the CIA or Pentagon or State Department? In other words, isn't the outrage over those latter leaks hypocritical and just outrage over political damage rather than over the moral substance?
To which the answer is a resounding NO, because when the President releases information (which makes it weird to call it a "leak"), it is by definition an authorized declassification, by Constitutional authority.
And by Excecutive Order, it's also authorized when the Vice President does it.
But, duh, when anyone else takes it upon themselves to expose classified information to the press, it's an unauthorized leak, they are commiting a crime, and should be punished.
Why is that so hard to understand? Here's a Congresswoman, for heaven's sake!
The ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee complained on Sunday that the fired CIA employee who leaked classified information to the Washington Post about top secret interrogations of al Qaeda suspects was being held to a higher standard than President Bush.Look at the laws, you idiot! There isn't some OTHER President with the "real" power to declassify things!
Asked if she saw similarities between Bush’s decision to share declassified intelligence on Iraq with the media - and CIA leaker Mary McCarthy, Rep. Jane Harman told “Fox News Sunday: “You bet I do.”
“While leaks are wrong, I think it is totally wrong for our president, in secret, to selectively declassify certain information and to empower people in his White House to leak it to favored reporters so they can discredit political enemies,” she griped.
But I digress.
More good stuff:
SOCOM has dispatched small teams of Army Green Berets and other Special Operations troops to US embassies in about 20 countries in the Middle East, Asia, Africa and Latin America, where they do operational planning and intelligence gathering, the paper said.Incredible!
The plan reportedly gives the military leadership leeway to inform -- rather than win the approval of -- the US ambassador in a country before conducting military operations in that country.
Not only are they gutting the involvement of the hopelessly politicized CIA, they are also taking out the meddling of the State department to throw up roadblocks.
I am reminded how we had Mullah Omar in our sites shortly after 9/11, but had to waste time getting approval from a cabal of military lawyers about whether or not using a 2,000-lb bomb to take out the building he was in would be "legal" or not (a ridiculous concept in this context!), and while they dithered he got away.
And finally, in addition to the main broad "general campaign plan",
A second plan is focused specifically on Al-Qaeda and associated movements, including more than a dozen groups spread across the Middle East, Central Asia, Southeast Asia and Africa, according to the report.The only question becomes, now that we've got a juicy target list, why wait for an attack?
...
The third plan sets out how the military can both disrupt and respond to another major terrorist strike on the United States, The Post said.
It includes annexes that offer options for the military to retaliate quickly against specific groups, individuals or state sponsors depending on who is believed to be behind an attack.
SOCOM has since 2003 been in charge of military planning for the war on terror, declared after the September 11, 2001 strikes. Its annual budget has grown 60 percent to eight billion dollars.
People Waking Up
In Belgium,
In my first encounter with this story, the report included the astounding assertion that the police investigating had been most concerned with determining whether or not the victim had said anything racially to provoke the attack!
Well it appears 80,000 people are tired of PC nonsense.
And in France, there is some plain speaking:
PARIS (Reuters) - A far-right French politician launched his 2007 presidential campaign on Sunday denouncing what he called the Islamisation of the country and declaring Islam incompatible with France's secular values.
In a weird subtext to this story, we have this alarming revelation:
And they let them still work there?
It's insanity.
The Villiers plan has some wonderful points:
And here's an interesting 98-minute movie:
And climbing the charts, now at #115 in sales at Amazon, is this book by the runner of jihadwatch.org:
For other relevant books, see here.
More and more people finding out the Truth, every day!
BRUSSELS (Reuters) - More than 80,000 people marched in silence through Brussels on Sunday in memory of a teenager stabbed to death by two [Muslim] suspects of North African origin in Belgium's biggest protest in 10 years, police said.The story tries hard to sweep the real issues under the rug. This is not some vague protest against "crime" in general, but about crime by islamic invaders.
In my first encounter with this story, the report included the astounding assertion that the police investigating had been most concerned with determining whether or not the victim had said anything racially to provoke the attack!
Well it appears 80,000 people are tired of PC nonsense.
And in France, there is some plain speaking:
PARIS (Reuters) - A far-right French politician launched his 2007 presidential campaign on Sunday denouncing what he called the Islamisation of the country and declaring Islam incompatible with France's secular values.
In a weird subtext to this story, we have this alarming revelation:
The daily Le Parisien, in an extensive report on Sunday on Villiers' charges about Islamist radicals at Charles de Gaulle airport, quoted officials saying the problem was minimal and suspicious workers were kept under surveillance.So they actually ADMIT there are islamist radicals working the airport, but it's "only" 122 of them!
Aware of the book's imminent publication, Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy and Justice Minister Dominique Perben toured the airport on Thursday and said only 122 of about 83,000 ground staff were being watched.
"There aren't 122, there are hundreds," said Villiers, quoting what he said were top secret police reports he used as the basis for his book and challenging Sarkozy to publish them.
And they let them still work there?
It's insanity.
The Villiers plan has some wonderful points:
Villiers said Islam was incompatible with the country's democratic system because he said it demanded loyalty to the ummah (world Muslim community) over any individual state, wanted to impose sharia Islamic law and promoted jihad, or holy war.Sounds good to me.
"I think there are moderate Muslims, they are even the large majority, but I do not believe there is a moderate Islam," he said. "I do not think Islam is compatible with the French republic."
Saying France had to fight what he called its Islamisation, he said Paris should stop all mosque construction, impose a citizen's charter demanding the strict separation of religion and state and freedom to change religions and demand strict respect for the equality of men and women.
It should also ban all Islamist organizations suspected of links to terrorism and expel any persons threatening the security of the French population.
And here's an interesting 98-minute movie:
ISLAM: What the West Needs to KnowThe Main Idea of the Film is
An examination of Islam, violence, and the fate of the non-Muslim world.
Virtually every major Western leader has over the past several years expressed the view that Islam is a peaceful religion and that those who commit violence in its name are fanatics who misinterpret its tenets. This claim, while widely circulated, rarely attracts serious public examination. Relying primarily on Islam’s own sources, this documentary demonstrates that Islam is a violent, expansionary ideology that seeks the destruction or subjugation of other faiths, cultures, and systems of government.We are told,
The film premiered at the American Film Renaissance’s Hollywood Film Festival in January.Watch for it!
Coming this summer.
And climbing the charts, now at #115 in sales at Amazon, is this book by the runner of jihadwatch.org:
The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (And the Crusades)
by Robert Spencer
For other relevant books, see here.
More and more people finding out the Truth, every day!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
